|
City Manager's Column: The Legacies of Public Officials.
1-7-01
You may have read this month's story
about the Mayor/City Council goals for 2002.
At the beginning of the planning session, Pat
Callahan, a predecessor of mine, suggested to each of our elected
people that they should consider two questions concerning their time
in elected office. The questions were: "What will your legacy
be?" And, "How do you want to be remembered?"
These are important questions.
My time as a city administrator and as an elected
person before that covers over 19 years. In that time, I've seen
different people run for office or apply for board appointments for
several different reasons:
A.) To serve the public, either with or without a
specific goal in mind.
B.) To try to improve something or make something
better.
C.) To be a part of the action or to become an
"insider."
D.) Because someone else asked them to.
E.) For a reason related to the candidate's ego.
F.) To keep a perceived bad candidate from
winning.
G.) To stop something such as an existing or
proposed program.
H.) To get even with someone.
I.) To gain by it on a personal and/or financial
level.
Some of these are positive reasons, but just as
many are not. This makes Pat's questions about a person's legacy
even more pointed.
Will an official be seen as making a contribution
to the betterment of his or her constituents, or will they be seen
as making things worse?
As for myself, when I was elected to my first
office, I ran because I wanted to serve the public, but there was an
ego issue as well. I wanted to see if a teenager could be elected to
our school board. I also had a goal in mind. Having recently
graduated from high school, I wanted to try to give more
significance to our high school's Student Council. I never liked the
school's method of electing people to student government when I was
a student. Back then, student elections were done in a single
half-hour class assembly. Added to that, service in school
government didn't do much to develop leadership skills in people.
Along with offering extracurricular sports, I
thought that our school should also put more time and effort into
developing extracurricular activities like the student government
and the student newspaper to develop future public leaders.
Later, when I joined my hometown's City Council in
1989, I did it because I was asked to fill in for the last few
months of an unexpired term. I ran in the next election because I
wanted to see if we could execute a project that many felt we
couldn't do. Namely, we were trying to become the first town in Iowa
in nearly 20 years to form a municipal natural gas utility.
As far as the idea of a legacy goes, I know that
Fairbank, IA has a municipal natural gas utility--though, I doubt
that anyone will remember that I was involved with the project. I
also believe in my heart that, once the town clears its debt service
for building this utility, the gas utility, along with Fairbank's
municipal electric utility, will make it a richer town.
As for my time as a school board member from
1978-1984, I never heard much in terms of a legacy for many years.
Then, on New Year's Eve of 1999, my wife and I were seated at a
table at a millenium party in Cedar Rapids with a person who worked
at the Wapsie Valley High School. While she was telling me about the
school, she mentioned that the student council there is elected by
way of filing "petitions of candidacy" then being allowed
to campaign for two weeks before their election.
I turned to my wife and said, "I can't
believe. That was an idea that I proposed 20 years ago." I had
always assumed that the program had been discontinued after I left
office.
In retrospect, I was not as effective a school
board member as I was a city council member. As a young school board
member, I was perceived as an outsider, and I did and said some
things that further made me an outsider. As a council member, I did
much better because I tried harder to understand how city government
worked and what was important to my fellow council members. I was
also a better communicator and tried not to appear as if I was
operating on an ego-driven agenda.
Public office is "give and take." It is
also a place where there is no such thing as a "last
laugh." I have often found that the person who is reveling in
the fact that he has just trounced an opponent on an issue today is
the same person who ends up wishing that he had that same person's
support on another issue a few months later.
No matter the reason why someone joins a public
governmental body, he or she should consider how their actions will
be seen by their fellow members, by their constituents, and in local
history.
|